Skip to main content
Attribute
Back to Blog
GuideUpdated December 31, 2025

Cart Abandonment Rates by Industry: 2025 Benchmarks

Overall average is 70%, but varies by industry: Fashion 68-72%, Beauty 65-70%, Electronics 75-80%, Furniture 78-82%, Food/Grocery 55-62%, Luxury 80-85%. Mobile abandons 10-15 points higher than desktop. Compare to your industry, not overall averages.

Attribute Team
E-commerce & Shopify Experts
December 31, 2025
6 min read
Cart Abandonment Rates by Industry - guide article about cart abandonment rates by industry: 2025 benchmarks

Your cart abandonment rate means nothing without context. A 75% rate might be excellent for luxury goods but terrible for consumables. This guide provides industry-specific benchmarks so you can accurately assess your performance.

Overall Cart Abandonment Benchmarks

The Global Average

2025 average cart abandonment rate: 70.19%

This means roughly 7 out of 10 shoppers who add items to cart leave without purchasing. This number has remained relatively stable over the past decade, fluctuating between 68-72%.

Why the Average Misleads

Industry variance: Rates range from 55% to 85% depending on industry.

Product type matters: Impulse purchases abandon less than considered purchases.

Price point impact: Higher prices mean more abandonment.

Device differences: Mobile abandons more than desktop.

Using the 70% average for your specific business is like using average human height to buy clothes. It might be close, but it is probably wrong.

Industry-Specific Benchmarks

Fashion and Apparel

Average abandonment: 68-72%

Good performance: 65% or below

Excellent: Under 60%

Why this rate:

  • Size uncertainty drives abandonment
  • Style consideration takes time
  • Often browsing without intent
  • High return rates factor into hesitation

Key challenges:

  • Fit concerns
  • Cannot try before buying
  • Frequent sales create wait-and-see behavior
  • Seasonal shopping patterns

Beauty and Cosmetics

Average abandonment: 65-70%

Good performance: 62% or below

Excellent: Under 58%

Why this rate:

  • Shade matching uncertainty
  • Ingredient concerns
  • Brand loyalty reduces comparison shopping
  • Subscription fatigue

Key challenges:

  • Color accuracy in photos
  • Skin type matching
  • Sample expectations
  • Subscription vs one-time decision

Electronics and Technology

Average abandonment: 75-80%

Good performance: 72% or below

Excellent: Under 68%

Why this rate:

  • High price points
  • Extensive research phase
  • Comparison shopping across retailers
  • Waiting for sales or new models

Key challenges:

  • Technical specifications comparison
  • Price matching expectations
  • Extended warranty decisions
  • Long consideration cycles

Home and Furniture

Average abandonment: 78-82%

Good performance: 75% or below

Excellent: Under 70%

Why this rate:

  • Major purchase decisions
  • Room measurement required
  • Style coordination concerns
  • Delivery logistics complexity

Key challenges:

  • Cannot see in person
  • Delivery costs for large items
  • Assembly concerns
  • Return difficulty for large items

Food and Grocery

Average abandonment: 55-62%

Good performance: 52% or below

Excellent: Under 48%

Why this rate:

  • Necessity-driven purchases
  • Lower decision stakes
  • Repeat purchase behavior
  • Time-sensitive needs

Key challenges:

  • Freshness concerns
  • Delivery windows
  • Minimum order requirements
  • Substitution policies

Health and Wellness

Average abandonment: 62-68%

Good performance: 58% or below

Excellent: Under 54%

Why this rate:

  • Need-driven purchases
  • Subscription models common
  • Brand loyalty
  • Replenishment behavior

Key challenges:

  • Ingredient verification
  • Effectiveness uncertainty
  • Subscription commitment
  • Price sensitivity for ongoing purchases

Jewelry and Luxury

Average abandonment: 80-85%

Good performance: 77% or below

Excellent: Under 73%

Why this rate:

  • High price points
  • Gift purchase consideration
  • Trust requirements higher
  • Longer decision cycles

Key challenges:

  • Cannot see quality in person
  • Sizing for rings
  • Authenticity concerns
  • Occasion timing

Sports and Outdoors

Average abandonment: 70-75%

Good performance: 67% or below

Excellent: Under 63%

Why this rate:

  • Seasonal purchasing
  • Equipment comparison needed
  • Size and fit concerns
  • Price sensitivity

Key challenges:

  • Technical specifications
  • Size matching
  • Seasonal timing
  • Brand loyalty competition

Pet Supplies

Average abandonment: 58-65%

Good performance: 55% or below

Excellent: Under 50%

Why this rate:

  • Need-driven purchases
  • Replenishment behavior
  • Pet preference concerns
  • Subscription availability

Key challenges:

  • Pet taste/preference uncertainty
  • Size/breed appropriateness
  • Subscription vs one-time
  • Emergency vs planned purchases

Baby and Kids

Average abandonment: 65-72%

Good performance: 62% or below

Excellent: Under 58%

Why this rate:

  • Gift purchases common
  • Size uncertainty (children grow)
  • Safety concerns
  • Registry comparisons

Key challenges:

  • Age appropriateness
  • Safety certifications
  • Size growth rates
  • Gift registry integration

Benchmarks by Cart Value

Low Cart Value (Under $50)

Average abandonment: 55-65%

Lower stakes mean faster decisions. Impulse purchases complete more often.

Key factors:

  • Shipping cost relative to order
  • Quick decision-making
  • Less comparison shopping

Medium Cart Value ($50-200)

Average abandonment: 65-75%

Standard e-commerce range. Balanced consideration.

Key factors:

  • Free shipping thresholds matter
  • Some comparison shopping
  • Payment options matter

High Cart Value ($200-500)

Average abandonment: 72-80%

More consideration required. Payment flexibility important.

Key factors:

  • Payment plan availability
  • Return policy scrutiny
  • Trust signals critical

Very High Cart Value ($500+)

Average abandonment: 78-85%

Major purchase behavior. Extended decision cycles.

Key factors:

  • Financing options essential
  • Multiple decision-makers
  • Extensive research phase
  • Often requires phone/chat support

Benchmarks by Device

Desktop

Average abandonment: 65-70%

Lower abandonment due to:

  • Easier checkout experience
  • Better product visualization
  • More likely planned purchases
  • Larger screen for comparison

Mobile

Average abandonment: 78-85%

Higher abandonment due to:

  • Checkout friction
  • Smaller screen limitations
  • More browsing behavior
  • Distraction likelihood
  • Form entry difficulty

Tablet

Average abandonment: 72-78%

Middle ground between desktop and mobile. Often used for browsing, completed on desktop.

Benchmarks by Traffic Source

Direct Traffic

Average abandonment: 60-68%

Returning customers with intent. Know the brand, often returning to complete.

Organic Search

Average abandonment: 68-75%

Mixed intent. Some searching with purchase intent, some researching.

Paid Search

Average abandonment: 70-77%

Higher intent than social, but often comparison shopping across ads.

Paid Social

Average abandonment: 78-85%

Lowest purchase intent. Often discovery-based, impulse adds without completion intent.

Email

Average abandonment: 55-65%

Existing customers with relationship. Often responding to specific offer.

Referral

Average abandonment: 65-72%

Varies by referral source quality. Trusted referrals convert better.

Seasonal Variations

Q1 (January-March)

Abandonment typically higher (+3-5%)

Post-holiday fatigue. Budget constraints. Returns focus.

Q2 (April-June)

Abandonment near average

Stabilized shopping. Some seasonal (outdoor, wedding) categories improve.

Q3 (July-September)

Abandonment near average

Back-to-school helps some categories. Pre-holiday browsing begins.

Q4 (October-December)

Abandonment varies widely

BFCM shows higher abandonment (more browsing). Gift shopping can complete quickly.

Holiday Weeks Specifically

BFCM: Abandonment often higher due to deal comparison and browsing multiple sites.

December pre-shipping-deadline: Abandonment drops as urgency increases.

Using These Benchmarks

Step 1: Find Your Category

Identify which industry benchmark applies. If you span categories, weight by revenue.

Step 2: Segment Your Data

Do not use overall rate. Break down by:

  • Device
  • Traffic source
  • Cart value
  • Customer type (new vs returning)

Step 3: Compare Accurately

Compare your segments to appropriate benchmarks, not overall averages.

Step 4: Identify Gaps

Where are you significantly above benchmark? Those are your opportunities.

Step 5: Prioritize Improvements

Focus on segments with largest gap and highest volume first.

When Your Rate Is Above Benchmark

1-5 Points Above Benchmark

Minor issue. Focus on quick wins:

  • Express checkout
  • Shipping transparency
  • Trust signals

5-10 Points Above Benchmark

Moderate issue. Deeper investigation needed:

  • Checkout process audit
  • Price competitiveness review
  • Mobile experience check

10+ Points Above Benchmark

Significant issue. Fundamental problems likely:

  • Traffic quality issues
  • Major UX problems
  • Trust or credibility concerns
  • Pricing or value proposition

When Your Rate Is Below Benchmark

Congratulations, but verify:

  • Is tracking accurate?
  • Is traffic quality unusually high?
  • Are you filtering out bot traffic?
  • Is sample size sufficient?

If genuinely below benchmark:

  • Document what you are doing right
  • Look for incremental improvements
  • Consider if you can scale successful tactics

Common Benchmark Mistakes

Mistake 1: Using Overall Average

Problem: Comparing fashion store to 70% average when industry is 72%.

Fix: Use industry-specific benchmarks.

Mistake 2: Ignoring Segments

Problem: Overall rate looks fine but mobile is 15 points above benchmark.

Fix: Segment and compare each segment to appropriate benchmark.

Mistake 3: Wrong Time Comparison

Problem: Comparing BFCM week to annual average.

Fix: Compare to same period prior year or seasonal benchmarks.

Mistake 4: Small Sample Size

Problem: Drawing conclusions from one week of data.

Fix: Use at least 30 days, preferably 90, for meaningful comparison.

Mistake 5: Not Accounting for Changes

Problem: Rate changed after site update but compared to old benchmark.

Fix: Note when changes occurred. Compare pre and post separately.

The Bottom Line

Your cart abandonment rate only matters relative to your specific context.

Key benchmarks by industry:

  • Fashion: 68-72%
  • Beauty: 65-70%
  • Electronics: 75-80%
  • Home/Furniture: 78-82%
  • Food/Grocery: 55-62%
  • Luxury/Jewelry: 80-85%

Segment your analysis by:

  • Device (mobile is always higher)
  • Traffic source (paid social highest)
  • Cart value (higher value = higher abandonment)
  • Season (Q4 varies significantly)

Action framework:

  1. Find your industry benchmark
  2. Segment your data
  3. Identify largest gaps
  4. Prioritize high-volume, high-gap segments
  5. Implement targeted improvements

A 70% abandonment rate might be excellent or terrible depending on your context. Know your benchmarks. Compare accurately. Improve systematically.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the average cart abandonment rate?

The global average is approximately 70% (7 out of 10 carts abandoned). However, this varies significantly by industry, device, traffic source, and cart value. Comparing to overall average is less useful than industry-specific benchmarks.

Which industries have highest cart abandonment?

Luxury/jewelry (80-85%), home/furniture (78-82%), and electronics (75-80%) have highest abandonment due to high prices, longer consideration cycles, and complex purchase decisions.

Which industries have lowest cart abandonment?

Food/grocery (55-62%), health/wellness (62-68%), and pet supplies (58-65%) have lowest abandonment due to necessity-driven, repeat-purchase behavior with lower decision stakes.

Why is mobile cart abandonment higher than desktop?

Mobile abandonment runs 10-15 points higher (78-85% vs 65-70%) due to checkout friction, smaller screens, form input difficulty, more browsing behavior, and distractions. Express checkout helps close this gap.

Sources & References

Written by

Attribute Team

E-commerce & Shopify Experts

The Attribute team combines decades of e-commerce experience, having helped scale stores to $20M+ in revenue. We build the Shopify apps we wish we had as merchants.

11+ years Shopify experience$20M+ in merchant revenue scaledFormer Shopify Solutions ExpertsActive Shopify Plus ecosystem partners